GOP-appointed judges join an unprecedented judicial pushback against executive overreach. The data is stunning—but will it matter when cases reach higher courts?
Calling it a rebellion or resistance make it seem like an ideological or political movement, which it isn't. It is judges enforcing the law and Constitution. The fact that they are equally R- and D-appointed judges makes the point.
This paper seems to once and for all justify putting an end to the constant gratuitous categorization of federal judges by the president who appointed them. This baseless, and lazy, reporting was calculated to politicize a judiciary that lawyers who practice before it, as I have, know is reckless and falls into line with the aim of the current administration to undermine the credibility of the judicial branch.
Calling it a rebellion or resistance make it seem like an ideological or political movement, which it isn't. It is judges enforcing the law and Constitution. The fact that they are equally R- and D-appointed judges makes the point.
Why do they keep getting overruled?
Helpful analysis! Helps to see through the noise to the signal: Virtually everything that Trump does is illegal or unconstitutional.
This paper seems to once and for all justify putting an end to the constant gratuitous categorization of federal judges by the president who appointed them. This baseless, and lazy, reporting was calculated to politicize a judiciary that lawyers who practice before it, as I have, know is reckless and falls into line with the aim of the current administration to undermine the credibility of the judicial branch.